The courtroom drama between the FTC and Meta feels like the tech version of a reality TV show, and trust me, it’s got all the tension of a season finale. Judge Boasberg is flipping through the FTC’s arguments like they’re a half-eaten sandwich—suspicious but still edible. He’s particularly interested in Hemphill’s testimony, which is like the plot twist no one saw coming.
Now, here’s where it gets spicy: Boasberg is questioning whether user engagement on Instagram really means anything. If our feeds are saturated with influencer posts that nobody asked for, does time spent scrolling equate to happiness? Or are we just mindlessly engaging with content that we didn’t choose? It’s kind of like binge-watching a show you don’t even like because you started and now, well, you’re too far in to stop.
So, as the judge wrestles with these weighty questions, we’re left wondering: if our feeds are manipulated by algorithms and not our own preferences, who’s really in control of our social media experience? Are we engaging with friends or just strangers vying for our attention?
Buckle up, folks. The tech courtroom saga is just heating up!
Leave a Reply